1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1971 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1971 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,752 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Ford Mustang (330 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Ford Mustang weights approximately 600 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1971 Ford Mustang (503 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1971 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1971 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Mustang |
Year Released | 1962 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5752 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 330 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 503 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |