1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1972 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1972 Toyota Corona is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1972 Toyota Corona. (82 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1972 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 110 kg more than 1972 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Toyota Corona. (123 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1972 Toyota Corona | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | Corona |
Year Released | 1962 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 123 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 51 L |