1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1976 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1976 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1976 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1976 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1976 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1976 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | AC | NSU |
| Model | Greyhound | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |
