1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1979 Austin Allegro
To start off, 1979 Austin Allegro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1979 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1979 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 200 kg more than 1979 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1979 Austin Allegro | |
| Make | AC | Austin |
| Model | Greyhound | Allegro |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 48 L |
