1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX
To start off, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX (124 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX weights approximately 145 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX (189 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1979 Nissan 260 ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1979 Nissan 260 ZX | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | 260 ZX |
Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 189 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |