1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1982 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1982 Lincoln Continental is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1982 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 520 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Lincoln Continental (237 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1982 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1982 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | AC | Lincoln |
Model | Greyhound | Continental |
Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 87 L |