1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1983 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1983 Toyota Cressida is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 155 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1983 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Greyhound | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2650 mm |
