1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1992 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1992 Ford Fairlane is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Fairlane (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 580 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Fairlane (311 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 1992 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Greyhound | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2930 mm |
