1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 5 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
Make | AC | Lotus |
Model | Greyhound | Elan |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 204 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |