1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1996 Opel Tigra
To start off, 1996 Opel Tigra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 Opel Tigra. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 1996 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Opel Tigra weights approximately 40 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1996 Opel Tigra | |
Make | AC | Opel |
Model | Greyhound | Tigra |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 125 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |