1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 835 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 295 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |