1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 1997 Ford F-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford F-250 (232 HP @ 2700 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1395 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (677 Nm) has 498 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | F-250 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 677 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3490 mm |