1962 AC Greyhound vs. 1999 Acura EL
To start off, 1999 Acura EL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura EL weights approximately 64 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Acura EL. (145 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 1999 Acura EL | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Greyhound | EL |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |