1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 BMW Z8
To start off, 2000 BMW Z8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z8 (400 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z8 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z8 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z8 (500 Nm) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 BMW Z8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2000 BMW Z8 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Greyhound | Z8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4939 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 73 L |