1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 8,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (335 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (617 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Suburban |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 8100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 617 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |