1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz S (301 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 460 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz S (460 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2000 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Greyhound | S |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 460 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 6160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 4090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 88 L |
