1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 355 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata E (210 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | AC | Tata |
Model | Greyhound | E |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2810 mm |