1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 605 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Mark II (378 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Greyhound | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 378 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
