1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2001 Buick Blackhawk
To start off, 2001 Buick Blackhawk is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 7,458 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Buick Blackhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Buick Blackhawk (458 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 335 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Buick Blackhawk should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Buick Blackhawk weights approximately 615 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Buick Blackhawk (705 Nm) has 526 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2001 Buick Blackhawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2001 Buick Blackhawk | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Greyhound | Blackhawk |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 458 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 705 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |