1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2002 TVR T 350
To start off, 2002 TVR T 350 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,605 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 TVR T 350 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 TVR T 350 (393 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2002 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2002 TVR T 350 | |
Make | AC | TVR |
Model | Greyhound | T 350 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 393 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |