1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 935 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2003 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Greyhound | Astro |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4292 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |
