1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (493 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 370 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 970 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz S (700 Nm) has 521 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2003 Mercedes-Benz S | |
| Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Greyhound | S |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 493 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 88 L |
