1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 270 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 192 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |