1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2004 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 610 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Terrano II (197 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2004 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 197 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |