1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (210 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 470 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Falcon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 357 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |