1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1461 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | Armada |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 106 L |