1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 209 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |