1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Nissan Armada is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 5,550 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Greyhound weights approximately 25 kg more than 2008 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2008 Nissan Armada | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Greyhound | Armada |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 106 L |