1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Audi A8
To start off, 2009 Audi A8 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A8 (229 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A8 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A8 (450 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2009 Audi A8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Greyhound | A8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 90 L |