1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 419 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Greyhound | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 550 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |