1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (153 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 246 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. (150 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |