1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Express is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Express (323 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1711 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Express (505 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | AC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Greyhound | Express |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 323 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 505 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2726 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5692 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2073 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3429 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 117 L |
