1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda CR-V (180 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda CR-V weights approximately 521 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | AC | Honda |
| Model | Greyhound | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1536 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 58 L |
