1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Kia Rio
To start off, 2010 Kia Rio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 Kia Rio. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Rio weights approximately 58 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Rio. (145 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Kia Rio | |
| Make | AC | Kia |
| Model | Greyhound | Rio |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1073 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4249 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2499 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |
