1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Scion xB
To start off, 2010 Scion xB is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion xB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion xB (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Scion xB (219 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Scion xB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Scion xB | |
Make | AC | Scion |
Model | Greyhound | xB |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 219 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4249 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 53 L |