1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 593 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Subaru Outback (335 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
Make | AC | Subaru |
Model | Greyhound | Outback |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 335 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1608 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |