1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Greyhound (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Golf. (104 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Greyhound should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Golf. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 299 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Golf (250 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2010 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | AC | Volkswagen |
Model | Greyhound | Golf |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 250 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1314 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |