1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 BMW Z4
To start off, 2011 BMW Z4 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW Z4 (182 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW Z4 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW Z4 (270 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2011 BMW Z4 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Greyhound | Z4 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2497 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |