1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 AC Greyhound | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | AC | Jaguar |
| Model | Greyhound | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |
