1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (352 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Greyhound | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 352 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2087 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1938 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 93 L |