1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2011 Subaru Forester is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Forester (170 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Subaru Forester weights approximately 482 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Subaru Forester (236 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2011 Subaru Forester | |
Make | AC | Subaru |
Model | Greyhound | Forester |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 236 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1699 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2616 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |