1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2012 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 725 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (233 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2012 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Greyhound | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 233 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |