1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 948 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Greyhound | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 366 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 76 L |