1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,700 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Highlander (187 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 775 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Highlander (252 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Greyhound | Highlander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 252 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 73 L |