1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 555 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Greyhound | ATS |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 373 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |