1962 AC Greyhound vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (134 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 519 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Greyhound (179 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. (174 Nm). This means 1962 AC Greyhound will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Greyhound | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2113 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 58 L |