1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 1983 Mercury Lynx is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 161 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 1983 Mercury Lynx
Make Alfa Romeo Mercury
Model 2600 Lynx
Year Released 1962 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2584 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1115 kg 954 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2400 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]