1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 100 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 2600 | Express |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2583 cc | 4818 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 386 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 117 L |