1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 632 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 2600 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2584 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 76 L |