1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (143 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1202 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 2600 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2584 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 132 L |
